Evaluation of clinical coding data to determine causes of critical bleeding in patients receiving massive transfusion: a bi-national, multicentre, cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of routinely collected data to determine the cause(s) of critical bleeding in patients who receive massive transfusion (MT). BACKGROUND: Routinely collected data are increasingly being used to describe and evaluate transfusion practice. MATERIALS/METHODS: Chart reviews were undertaken on 10 randomly selected MT patients at 48 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand to determine the cause(s) of critical bleeding. Diagnosis-related group (DRG) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes were extracted separately and used to assign each patient a cause of critical bleeding. These were compared against chart review using percentage agreement and kappa statistics. RESULTS: A total of 427 MT patients were included with complete ICD and DRG data for 427 (100%) and 396 (93%), respectively. Good overall agreement was found between chart review and ICD codes (78·3%; κ = 0·74, 95% CI 0·70-0·79) and only fair overall agreement with DRG (51%; κ = 0·45, 95% CI 0·40-0·50). Both ICD and DRG were sensitive and accurate for classifying obstetric haemorrhage patients (98% sensitivity and κ > 0·94). However, compared with the ICD algorithm, DRGs were less sensitive and accurate in classifying bleeding as a result of gastrointestinal haemorrhage (74% vs 8%; κ = 0·75 vs 0·1), trauma (92% vs 62%; κ = 0·78 vs 0·67), cardiac (80% vs 57%; κ = 0·79 vs 0·60) and vascular surgery (64% vs 56%; κ = 0·69 vs 0·65). CONCLUSION: Algorithms using ICD codes can determine the cause of critical bleeding in patients requiring MT with good to excellent agreement with clinical history. DRG are less suitable to determine critical bleeding causes.

A 'dangerous' group O donor: severe hemolysis in all recipients of organs from a donor with multiple red cell alloantibodies.

Alloimmune hemolysis is a recognized but infrequent complication of solid organ transplantation, particularly where there is incompatibility within the ABO blood group system. We describe severe hemolysis due to passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) in all three recipients of organs from a single donor with multiple red cell (RC) alloantibodies. The first patient, a liver transplant recipient, required augmentation of immunosuppression to treat immune hemolysis due to anti-B, -D, -C and -Cellano (k). This is the first description of PLS caused by alloantibody to the high incidence RC antigen, k. The two single lung transplant recipients developed hemolysis due to anti-D. Both required escalation of immunosuppression and early transfusion support. Three months posttransplant, all three patients have ongoing evidence of compensated hemolysis. This series highlights the potential for severe non-ABO-mediated immune hemolysis following solid organ transplantation. A positive donor RC antibody screen should prompt careful monitoring of organ recipients for hemolysis.

B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with CD8 expression: report of 10 cases and immunochemical analysis of the CD8 antigen.

We report 10 cases of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL) with expression of the T-cell antigen CD8. The majority of patients had typical B-cell CLL with stable and non-progressive stage A(O) disease except for more common expression of lambda light chain and CD25. Two patients had progressive disease and required therapy, one with atypical morphological and phenotypic features. The incidence of CD8 expression was approximately 0.5% of B-CLL patients from our institutions. Immunoprecipitation of the CD8 antigen from four of these B-CLLs showed identity to the CD8 antigen expressed on T cells with precipitation of CD8alpha bands of molecular weight approximately 34 kD. In view of the known intracellular signalling mechanism of CD8 using the tyrosine kinase p56-lck, we studied p56-lck expression by Western blot and found lack of consistent expression of the CD8 surface antigen, with most lacking p56-lck. Our report indicates that CD8 expression in B-CLL is probably underrecognized but is not a marker of disease progression. The CD8 on the B-CLL surface is immunochemically identical to the antigen on T cells, but is not accompanied by its usual signalling mechanism of p56-lck tyrosine kinase and therefore is unlikely to be a functionally active receptor.

The use of IgH fingerprinting and ASO-dependent PCR for the investigation of residual disease (MRD) in ALL.

In acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), investigation of minimal residual disease by conventional morphology and immunology fails to detect levels of residual disease of < 1 leukaemic in 10-100 normal cells. The use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to exploit the diversity of the complementarity determining region (CDR) and immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (VH) family specific usage has greatly improved the sensitivity up to one leukaemic cell in 10(5)-10(6) normal bone marrow cells. Here we report on a prospective study of 14 patients with ALL of B-cell lineage by using a combined PCR approach which estimates levels of disease between 1:10(3) and 1:10(5). The sequential use of allele-specific oligoprimer (ASO) independent tests (using framework 1. FR1 and 3, FR3 primers with a JH consensus primer, sensitivity up to 1:5 x 10(3)) and ASO-dependent PCR (sensitivity up to 1:10(5)) assays were applied to 64 bone marrow (BM) follow-up samples in a sequential array of tests. Results presented in this study indicate high concordance of MRD among different tests for samples with level of residual disease > 1:5 x 10(3). Consequently, samples positive by the FR1 and FR3 fingerprinting tests were confirmed by the more sensitive ASO-dependent tests, as expected. However, the ASO-dependent assays revealed levels of disease undetected by the FR1 and FR3 test. Although a higher level of sensitivity is provided by the ASO-dependent tests, the FR1 and FR3 fingerprinting tests allow MRD investigation in patients with oligoclonal B cell proliferations, CDR3 region of size < 15 bp or with ASO primers unsuitable for PCR investigation on technical grounds (i.e. background signal). If a sequential order of investigation from less (e.g. FR1 and FR3 fingerprinting) to more sensitive tests (ASO-dependent) is applied, an indirect estimate of MRD is obtained for patients with level of disease < 1:10(3).

Genetic changes: relevance for diagnosis and detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Cure can now be achieved in a proportion of patients with ALL. However, relapse and eventual treatment failure occur in many cases receiving identical treatment, presumably as a result of failure to eradicate MRD. While for many years marrow morphology has been the standard by which leukaemic remission has been assessed, more sensitive techniques have been developed for detection of MRD including immunophenotypic analysis, and as discussed in this chapter, methods which detect leukemia-associated clonal genetic changes at the karyotypic and genomic levels. Table 10 lists the applicability and sensitivity of various markers used in MRD analysis in ALL. It is apparent that of the karyotypic and molecular approaches described, only PCR-based strategies for detection of either leukaemia-specific translocations or clonal Ag receptor rearrangements are reliably applicable to a high proportion of both B- and T-ALL at sufficiently high sensitivity. Initial clinical studies of patients undergoing therapy for ALL using a variety of PCR-based methods suggest that in some cases a persistent or increasing level of residual disease may be predictive for clinical relapse, although a number of technical factors and the phenomena of oligo-clonality and clonal evolution may limit the usefulness of this analysis in a few instances. From current available data it appears that in order to define the potential predictive value of PCR detection of MRD a large number of patients will need to be prospectively assessed over several years at multiple time points during and after therapy, preferably using more than one semi-quantitative PCR approach. In addition to reliable prediction of clinical relapse allowing appropriate individual treatment modification, progress in the molecular detection of MRD in ALL is also likely to be of benefit in the assessment of the efficacy of autograft purging and the evaluation of new therapeutic strategies such as the use of biological response modifiers to eliminate a low tumour burden.